Lawyers Begin Filing Federal Tort Claims for More Than 300 South Korean Workers Detained in 2025 Georgia Hyundai Raid
Attorneys have started filing administrative claims with nine federal agencies — the required first step before suing the U.S. government — over the September 4, 2025 immigration raid at the Hyundai-LG battery site in Ellabell, Georgia.
A Charter Plane Home, A Year Of Legal Filings
On September 4, 2025, federal agents descended on a construction site in Ellabell, Georgia, and detained 475 people. Most were South Korean nationals working for subcontractors on a $4.3 billion Hyundai-LG Energy Solution battery plant[1][12]. Officials and news organizations agree it was the largest single-site immigration enforcement action on record[1][12]. A week later, a chartered plane carrying 316 South Koreans and 14 other foreign workers landed at Incheon Airport[9].
A year has passed. The plant is still being built. Some of the same Korean workers have gone back to work there[11]. And now lawyers for more than 300 of the detained workers have started filing administrative claims against nine federal agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security, ICE, and the FBI[1][2].
That filing is not a lawsuit yet. It is the required first step before one, under a law called the Federal Tort Claims Act. The claims allege false imprisonment and intentional infliction of emotional distress, and they seek money for lost wages, confiscated belongings, and psychological harm[1]. One Korean attorney leading the effort says she wants to file for every affected worker by the end of 2026[1][2].
The Fact Nobody Disputes, And The One Nobody Has Settled
Both sides agree on the video. ICE released footage showing detained workers restrained with chains at the hands, ankles and waist[1]. Both sides agree on the paperwork: DHS said everyone arrested was "found to be working illegally, in violation of the terms of their visas and/or statuses"[6]. Nobody is contesting that the raid happened, or that hundreds of people were held for days before flying home.
What's actually in dispute is narrower, and stranger, than it first looks. It isn't whether these workers were shackled. It's whether they were lawfully present and lawfully working in the first place, and whether the way they were arrested crossed a legal line even if they weren't.
DHS described three groups among those detained: people who entered illegally, people who overstayed a visa, and people legally in the country but not allowed to work[6]. Most detainees fell into that third group. They held B-1 business-visitor visas or entered under the ESTA visa-waiver program, tools meant for meetings, contract talks, or equipment inspections[6]. Neither one covers paid, hands-on construction labor, no matter how many days are left on the 90-day clock a B-1 visa allows[6].
That distinction is the whole case in miniature. A worker can be telling the truth when he says he was well within his 90 days, and still have been working illegally under DHS's reading of the rule[6]. Lawyers for some detainees dispute even that, arguing their clients weren't doing the kind of work the government says they were[6]. The strongest single piece of evidence for the workers' side isn't Korean at all: Alfredo Fajardo Melgarejo, a Colombian worker whose lawyers say he held valid work authorization the day of the raid, was swept up anyway and deported in May 2026. His attorneys have filed a separate $2 million claim[3][5].
Why The Same Fight Will Happen At The Next Plant, Too
Underneath the legal filings sits a mismatch nobody has fixed. The U.S. wants foreign companies to build factories on American soil. But it has no routine short-term visa for the specialized engineers those companies need to install and start up the equipment[6]. A B-1 visa lets someone attend a meeting or inspect a machine. It does not let them wire it up for pay.
Until that gap closes, this exact conflict will keep happening at the next Korean, Japanese, or German plant built in the U.S. It doesn't depend on who wins this particular case[2][10]. That's the structural pressure driving Seoul's response, and it's also the argument Hyundai, LG, and the immigration lawyers who advise foreign manufacturers keep making.
There's a second, separate structural fact worth knowing before reading the workers' claims: the FTCA is a narrow door. The law lets people sue the federal government, but it doesn't waive the government's immunity for "discretionary functions" — broad policy calls about when and how to enforce the law[1][4]. That's why the workers' claims focus more on how they were treated once in custody than on whether the raid should have happened. One claimant says he went eleven days without a phone call, and others describe inadequate medical care[1][4]. That's the part of the story their lawyers can actually win on.
Two Governments, One Number, And A Word That Means Different Things To Each
Border czar Tom Homan cast the raid as the start of something bigger, promising more workplace raids and warning employers against illegal hiring[8]. For DHS and the administration, the operation was a criminal investigation carried out under a judge-signed search warrant, not a street sweep, and its visibility is part of the point. Worksite enforcement works as a deterrent mainly by being seen, which makes large, publicized raids a feature of the strategy rather than an accident of it[1][8].
Seoul's calculation runs on different math entirely. In the immediate aftermath, President Lee Jae-myung warned that Korean firms would hesitate to keep investing in the U.S. without a workable visa system, tying the raid directly to South Korea's $350 billion pledge made during the same tariff talks[2][9][10]. That framing is a year old now. Since then, Korea's National Assembly passed a special law implementing the $350 billion pledge in March 2026, and in June 2026 the government launched a state-run vehicle called Korea-US Strategic Investment Corp to carry it out[15][16].
So the money didn't stop moving. What's live now, as of this September, is Washington pressing Seoul for investment beyond that original $350 billion figure — a negotiation over more, not a fight over whether the original deal survives[15][16]. Seoul's leverage over U.S. immigration policy is limited. Its leverage over where Korean companies choose to build factories is not, and that's the lever it keeps pulling.
What The Headlines Left Out, Each In A Different Direction
The coverage split largely along the lines you'd expect, but the specific omissions are telling. CNN, which broke the filing story, framed it as workers against "the Trump administration" and led with detention conditions; ICE's stated legal basis for the arrests appeared, but well below the claimants' accounts[1]. Fox News centered border czar Tom Homan's promise of more raids and treated the detained workers mainly as evidence in a story about employer conduct, not as people with claims of their own[7][8].
Korean-language outlets nationalized the story as "Korean workers" against the "US gov't," largely leaving out DHS's three-category breakdown of who was and wasn't authorized to work[2]. Al Jazeera reframed the whole episode as a story about U.S. economic self-harm, questioning the $350 billion investment drive using a description of that pledge that, by this September, was already out of date[9]. An opinion piece in Fox News stated as settled fact the very question the claims are meant to test, calling the raid an operation that "uncovers illegal South Korean labor force"[7].
What Happens Next
Under the Federal Tort Claims Act, if an agency doesn't resolve a claim within six months, the worker can then file suit in federal court[1]. That clock means the earliest possible lawsuits would land sometime in 2027, and only after the attorney leading the effort finishes filing for the full group of more than 300 workers, a process she says will run through the end of this year[1][2].
Whatever a court eventually decides about the legality of the arrests, the underlying trade goes on regardless. The U.S. still wants the battery capacity these plants produce, and Korea still wants access to the American market building them provides[9][15][16]. Both governments have reason to settle the visa question on their own terms and let the individual legal claims run their separate course. For now, they're running on two different timelines that haven't yet met.
Summary
On September 4, 2025, federal agents raided the Hyundai-LG Energy Solution battery plant under construction in Ellabell, Georgia. They detained 475 people. Most were South Korean nationals working for subcontractors[1][12]. It was the largest immigration enforcement action at a single U.S. site on record[12]. A week later, 316 South Koreans and 14 other foreign workers flew home on a chartered plane[9].
One year later, lawyers for more than 300 of those workers have begun filing administrative claims against nine federal agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security, ICE, Customs and Border Protection, the FBI, and the Departments of Justice and Labor[1][2]. This is a required first step under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the law that lets people sue the federal government for harm caused by its employees. The claims allege false imprisonment, abuse of process and intentional infliction of emotional distress. They seek money for confiscated belongings, lost work and psychological harm[1]. Importantly, the filings are still in progress: a Korean attorney representing the workers said she aims to file for all of them by the end of the year[1][2].
The government's position, stated at the time of the raid, is that the people arrested were 'found to be working illegally, in violation of the terms of their visas and/or statuses'[6]. A DHS official described three groups: people who entered the country illegally, people who overstayed visas, and people legally present but not allowed to work[6]. Most detainees held B-1 business-visitor visas or entered under the ESTA visa-waiver program[6]. Neither allows paid hands-on construction labor.
That is the real point of dispute. It is not whether the raid happened or whether the workers were chained — ICE's own video showed restraints[1]. It is whether these specific workers were lawfully present and lawfully working, and whether the way they were arrested and held crossed a legal line even if they were not. Lawyers for at least some detainees say their clients were inside the 90-day window a business visa allows[6]. A separate $2 million claim was filed by Alfredo Fajardo Melgarejo, a Colombian worker whose lawyers say he had valid work authorization at the time of the raid and who was deported in May 2026[3][5].
The Event
On September 4, 2025, agents led by Homeland Security Investigations executed a judicial search warrant at the Hyundai Motor Group-LG Energy Solution battery plant under construction in Ellabell, Bryan County, Georgia, and detained 475 people[1][12]. South Korea's foreign ministry said the group released and flown home on September 12 included 316 Koreans, 10 Chinese nationals, three Japanese nationals and one Indonesian[9]. On September 15, 2026, CNN reported that lawyers had begun filing administrative claims on behalf of more than 300 of the detained South Korean workers with nine federal agencies[1]. The filings are the mandatory first step before a Federal Tort Claims Act lawsuit, and the attorney leading them said she intends to file for all the workers by the end of 2026[1][2].
Undisputed Facts
- Federal agents detained 475 people at the Ellabell, Georgia site on September 4, 2025, in what officials and news organizations described as the largest single-site immigration enforcement action on record[1][12].
- Most of those detained were South Korean nationals, and most worked for subcontractors rather than for Hyundai itself[1][12].
- ICE stated that those arrested were 'found to be working illegally, in violation of the terms of their visas and/or statuses'[6].
- Most detainees had entered the U.S. on B-1 business-visitor visas or under the ESTA visa-waiver program[6].
- South Korea chartered a plane; 316 South Koreans and 14 other foreign workers landed at Incheon Airport on September 12, 2025[9].
- ICE released video showing detained workers restrained with chains at the hands, ankles and waist[1].
- Claims have begun to be filed with nine federal agencies, including DHS, ICE, CBP, the FBI, and the Departments of Justice and Labor; they are not yet filed for all workers[1][2].
- Under the Federal Tort Claims Act, if an agency does not resolve a claim within six months, the claimant may file suit in federal court[1].
- Some Korean workers later returned to their jobs at the Georgia site[11].
The Pressure
Strip away the moralizing and blame. What structural realities persist regardless of which narrative wins?
- The visa gap is real and unfixed
- The U.S. wants foreign-owned factories built on its soil but has no routine short-term visa for the vendor engineers who install specialized production lines. B-1 and ESTA cover meetings and inspections, not hands-on paid work[6]. Until that gap closes, the same conflict recurs at every new plant, regardless of who wins this case[2][10].
- Deterrence requires visibility
- Worksite enforcement works as policy mainly by being seen. That makes large, publicized operations and images of restrained detainees features of the strategy, not accidents of it — and it is exactly those features the claims target[1][8].
- Money is the lever Seoul actually holds
- Korea has limited leverage over U.S. immigration enforcement, but substantial leverage over where its firms build. Even after formally committing $350 billion via a special law and a new state investment vehicle, Seoul is still using the pace and terms of that money as its main pressure point on the visa question[9][15][16].
- The FTCA is a narrow door
- The Federal Tort Claims Act waives the government's normal immunity from being sued, but only partly. It bars claims arising from 'discretionary functions' — broad policy and enforcement judgments. So the workers' case is stronger on how they were treated in custody than on whether the raid should have happened at all. That legal fact shapes what their lawyers emphasize[1][4].
Material realityThe plant is a $4.3 billion joint venture and it is still being built[9]. Some of the same Korean workers have returned to the site[11]. The U.S. record is fixed: 475 people detained on September 4, 2025; 330 flown home on September 12[1][9]. South Korea's $350 billion investment pledge, initially made amid the same tariff talks that preceded the raid, was subsequently codified into law (March 2026) and is now being implemented through a state-run investment corporation (June 2026), with Washington now asking for more than the original figure[15][16]. Whatever a court eventually decides about the arrests, the U.S. still needs Korean battery capacity and Korea still needs U.S. market access, so both governments have strong reasons to settle the visa question and let the legal claims run separately. Practically, the claims now sit in a six-month administrative window; the earliest possible federal lawsuits would come in 2027[1].
How Each Side Sees It
Each major actor’s view — how it frames things, its underlying incentive, and how it’s materially affected. Tap a side to read it.
Frames it asTheir case rests on a distinction the government blurs: even a person who violated a visa condition does not forfeit the right to be arrested and held lawfully. They say they were shackled at hands, ankles and waist, held in poor conditions, denied contact with the outside world — one claimant says he got no phone call for eleven days — and given inadequate medical care[1][4]. Their second argument is that many of them were not violating anything. Lawyers for some detainees say their clients were on B-1 visas allowing up to 90 days of business travel and were well inside that window[6]. Their strongest single piece of evidence is not Korean at all: Alfredo Fajardo Melgarejo, a Colombian worker who his lawyers say held valid work authorization on the day of the raid, was swept up anyway and deported in May 2026[3][5]. If the raid caught an authorized worker, they argue, it was not a targeted operation against known violators.
WhyMoney for lost wages, confiscated property and psychological harm, and a court record that establishes what happened. Several also want to keep working in the U.S. — some already have returned to the Georgia site[11] — so a ruling on the legality of the arrests affects their future ability to travel and work here[1].
Impact on themThey lost a week or more of liberty, missed work, and in some cases had belongings confiscated. Deportation or a removal record can bar future U.S. entry for years. Under the FTCA, the six-month agency clock means their practical timeline to court runs roughly to spring 2027 for the earliest-filed claims[1].
Frames it asTheir position is that this was a criminal investigation into unlawful employment, carried out under a judge-signed search warrant — not a street sweep[6]. The government says everyone arrested was found to be working in violation of their visa or status, and it describes three distinct groups: illegal entrants, overstays, and people lawfully present but not authorized to work[6]. That last category is the crux for them. A B-1 business visitor may attend meetings, negotiate contracts or inspect equipment. Hands-on paid construction work is not permitted, no matter how many days remain on the 90-day allowance[6]. On that reading, a worker can be entirely truthful about being 'within his 90 days' and still be working illegally. Border czar Tom Homan framed the operation as a deterrent message to employers, promising more workplace raids[8]. Officials also argue restraints during transport are standard practice, not punishment.
WhyTo keep worksite enforcement as a usable tool. A large damages award or an adverse ruling on arrest procedure would raise the legal cost of every future operation of this kind[8].
Impact on themDHS now faces claims from more than 300 individuals plus at least one seven-figure individual claim[1][3]. The FTCA also created a diplomatic cost: the raid strained relations with a treaty ally and became entangled with a $350 billion Korean investment package[9].
Frames it asSeoul's argument is structural, not moral. It says the U.S. asked Korean firms to build factories in America but never created a visa category that lets Korean engineers and technicians legally install and commission the equipment they built. In the immediate aftermath, President Lee Jae-myung warned that Korean companies would hesitate to invest further without a fixed visa system, and pushed for either larger visa quotas or a new category[2][9][10]. Since then, Seoul has moved ahead regardless: its National Assembly passed a special bill implementing the $350 billion pledge in March 2026, and a state-run vehicle, Korea-US Strategic Investment Corp, launched in June 2026 to execute it — with Washington now pressing Seoul for investment beyond that original figure[15][16]. Seoul's framing is that the workers were caught in a gap between two U.S. policies — industrial policy that wants the plants, and immigration policy that criminalizes the people who build them — and that the visa gap remains unresolved even as the money moves forward. Officials promised visa fixes and support for the returned workers[10].
WhyProtect the alliance and the investment relationship while answering intense domestic anger. Korean public opinion registered the chained-worker images as a humiliation of a treaty ally[9].
Impact on themSeoul chartered a plane to bring 330 workers home[9], and continues to negotiate the scale and terms of an investment commitment that has grown more, not less, demanding since the raid[15][16].
Frames it asThe companies' position is that most of those detained worked for subcontractors, not for Hyundai or LG directly, and that the parent firms did not knowingly employ unauthorized workers[1][12]. Their broader argument, echoed by immigration lawyers advising foreign manufacturers, is that specialized battery-line equipment requires the vendor's own engineers to install it, and that no practical U.S. visa exists for that short-term, highly technical work. Critics dispute the clean-hands framing: the United Auto Workers condemned Hyundai's record on worker safety at the site after the raid[14].
WhyFinish a $4.3 billion joint-venture plant on schedule while avoiding criminal exposure for unlawful employment[9].
Impact on themConstruction disruption, reputational damage, and pressure on the broader wave of Korean manufacturing investment in the U.S. Some Korean workers have since returned to the site[11].
Like this article?
The Bias Ledger average rating 5.3
The same story, as framed by outlets across the spectrum, ordered least to most biased. The bias score (1 = straight, 10 = heavily spun) is an AI assessment of that framing — click an outlet to see its track record. The tell is the word choice or omission that reveals the angle.
| Outlet | Vantage | Bias | How they frame it | The tell |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Korea Times | South Korean, English-language daily | 3 | 'Over 300 Korean workers take legal action against US gov't over Georgia raid.' | Neutral verb choice, but nationalizes the story — 'Korean workers' versus 'US gov't.' Omits ICE's three-category account of the detainees' status almost entirely. |
| CNN | U.S. center-left | 4 | 'Exclusive: More than 300 South Korean workers are challenging the Trump administration over its Georgia immigration raid.' | Frames the story as workers versus 'the Trump administration' rather than versus specific agencies, and foregrounds detention conditions. ICE's stated legal basis appears, but lower and in less detail than the claimants' accounts. |
| The Atlanta Journal-Constitution | U.S. center-left, Georgia metro daily | 4 | 'ICE faces $2M claim over unprecedented raid at Hyundai site in Georgia.' | Leads with the largest dollar figure available — a single claim by a Colombian worker — which can read as the size of the whole action. The word 'unprecedented' is defensible on the record but does editorial work in a headline. |
| Fox News | U.S. right | 5 | 'Tom Homan vows more workplace raids after Georgia plant arrests 475 — warns companies against illegal hiring.' | Centers the enforcement official and the employer-deterrence message. The detained workers are the object of the sentence, not subjects with accounts of their own. |
| Al Jazeera | Qatari state-funded | 5 | 'South Korea questions $350bn investment drive amid US immigration crackdown.' | Reframes a labor and legal story as U.S. economic self-harm. 'Crackdown' is the outlet's word, not an attributed characterization. |
| Fox News (Opinion) | U.S. right | 8 | 'Hyundai plant raid uncovers illegal South Korean labor force in Georgia.' | 'Uncovers' and 'illegal labor force' state as settled the exact question the claims dispute — whether each worker's status was unlawful. Labeled opinion by the outlet, so it is not newsroom framing. |
| International Business Times | U.K.-based aggregator, traffic-driven | 8 | 'They Might Torture You: 300+ South Koreans File Claims Against Trump Admin Over Georgia Raid Alleging Unlawful Detention.' | Promotes an alleged quote about torture into the headline, and says the claims are 'filed' when filing is still underway. Aggregated from CNN's reporting rather than independently sourced. |
References
- Exclusive: More than 300 South Korean workers are challenging the Trump administration over its Georgia immigration raid — CNN · U.S. center-left cable and digital newsroom
- Over 300 Korean workers take legal action against US gov't over Georgia raid — The Korea Times · South Korean English-language daily, centrist-establishment
- ICE faces $2M claim over unprecedented raid at Hyundai site in Georgia — The Atlanta Journal-Constitution · Georgia metro daily, center-left editorial page
- Worker detained by ICE during Hyundai raid files FTCA claim, sues US government — WTOC · Savannah-area CBS affiliate, local news
- Hyundai Metaplant ICE raid — Colombian worker files $2M claim — The Korea Daily · Korean-American community newspaper (JoongAng affiliate)
- What are B-1 visas some had at Hyundai plant in Georgia? — PolitiFact · Poynter Institute fact-checking project; critics on the right dispute its topic selection
- Hyundai plant raid uncovers illegal South Korean labor force in Georgia (opinion) — Fox News (Opinion) · U.S. right; this item is a labeled opinion piece
- Tom Homan vows more workplace raids after Georgia plant arrests 475 — Fox News · U.S. right
- South Korea questions $350bn investment drive amid US immigration crackdown — Al Jazeera · Qatari state-funded international broadcaster
- What's next after Georgia raid? Seoul promises visa fixes, care for returned workers — The Korea Herald · South Korean English-language daily, close to business and government sources
- Some Korean workers detained in Georgia immigration raid have returned to their jobs at Hyundai site — CNN · U.S. center-left
- Hundreds of South Korean nationals detained in largest single-site immigration raid — NBC News · U.S. center-left broadcast newsroom
- 'They Might Torture You': 300+ South Koreans File Claims Against Trump Admin Over Georgia Raid — International Business Times · U.K.-based aggregator, traffic-driven
- UAW condemns Hyundai over worker safety after Georgia factory raid — Fox Business · U.S. right-leaning business network
- Seoul launches state-run body to implement $350 bil. US investment pledge — The Korea Times · South Korean English-language daily, centrist-establishment
- South Korea passes special bill to implement its $350 billion U.S. investment pledge — CNBC · U.S. center, business-focused broadcast newsroom