Trump Congratulates Democrats After They Win the House and Senate, Mentions His Veto Power, and Says Some GOP Candidates Were to Blame
In election-night calls with CBS News and Fox News, President Trump said he would work with the new Democratic majorities. He also said he could "veto everything" and wrote that he would have won "in a landslide" if he had been on the ballot.
Two calls on election night, one president
Late Tuesday, President Trump told CBS News: "My message is congratulations to the Democrats, and I look forward to working with you for the good of our country"[1]. In the same call he added: "Otherwise I'd just veto everything, and they're not gonna want that"[1][2]. Both lines came from one conversation. Outlets mostly picked one.
The Associated Press called the House for Democrats at about 1:30 a.m. ET on Nov. 4. By then Democrats had flipped at least 27 House seats. That count was partial while results were still coming in[7].
In the Senate, Democrats held at least 54 of 100 seats after flipping at least seven. Al Jazeera reported them leading in two more races[7][8].
Whose fault, in Trump's telling
Trump put most of the weight on the candidates. He said "in some cases they didn't like the candidates, and in some cases those candidates were not my friend"[1][2]. He also suggested his base turned out less because he wasn't on the ballot[1].
On Truth Social he wrote: "I wasn't on the Ballot and if I was, we would have won IN A LANDSLIDE!"[3]. In a Fox News interview he said Democrats "did a good job" and that voters "didn't like the candidates"[11][16]. Forbes reported that he said he accepts the results[6].
A White House official made the same case. "Candidate quality matters," the official said. The official added that Trump "did a better job promoting many of the candidates on the ballot than the candidates did themselves"[9].
Trump also named other factors. "I think a part of it was Iran," he said, "but at the same time, people understood the importance of what I've done with Iran"[4][5]. Asked about the war showing up in exit polls, he said: "I think it's the gasoline price"[5].
The other reading of the vote
Democrats read the result differently. They say voters judged Trump's record, not his candidates. They point to the Iran war, gas near $4 a gallon, and tariffs[10][11].
HuffPost added a point about Trump's own words. He had asked voters to treat the midterms as a vote on him, the outlet noted. In its telling, they did[12].
So the dispute is over what the election was about. Trump's side says it was local contests decided by weak candidates. His critics say it was a national verdict on him. Trump's own remarks about Iran and gas prices sit in between, because they name national issues while keeping the blame on candidates[4][5].
Republicans turn on each other
Inside the GOP, the question has real consequences. Speaker Mike Johnson said he was "disappointed" but "never discouraged"[19]. Below the leaders, the party split. Some blamed candidate choices and campaign strategy. Others, including some departing lawmakers, blamed Trump or his team[13][20].
Axios reported that House Republicans began torching one another over the losses. It also reported that leaders face internal elections next week that they might not survive[13]. Members who come back need Trump's base to win primaries. They also need swing voters to win general elections[13].
Whoever wins the argument over why Republicans lost gains leverage. That leverage covers the party's leadership races and its 2028 primaries[13][20].
What a veto can and can't stop
Trump's veto line is a real constraint. Under Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution, a vetoed bill becomes law only if two-thirds of both chambers vote to override. In practice that means two-thirds of members present and voting[15].
The math is tough. With about 54 Senate seats, Democrats would need at least 13 Republican senators to reach 67, if all 100 senators vote[8][15]. So the threat is credible. But a veto only blocks bills. It doesn't let Trump pass anything, so each side can stop the other[8][15].
Oversight works differently. Committee hearings, subpoenas and Senate votes on nominees need no presidential signature[8][14]. That's why Democrats talk about investigations, and why a veto can't reach them. It also means Trump faces Democratic control of both chambers for the first time in either of his terms. Bills he wants will now need Democratic votes[8].
From his side, the offer to work together, backed by a veto, is ordinary divided government. In effect it says: deal with me, or nothing passes[1].
Same call, different headlines
Outlets split on which half of the call to feature. CBS led with its own scoop and the friendly line. It gave the veto quote as the follow-up[1].
Fox News reported the congratulations plainly and called the Democratic win "dominant"[16]. Its companion story ran under a headline about Republicans blaming Trump. It highlighted Democratic victory posts such as Sen. Ron Wyden's one-word "Subpoenas," which can read as casting oversight as payback[14]. Trump himself attacked Fox's election coverage that night[21].
On the left, HuffPost's headline said voters "eagerly obliged" Trump's request. That sarcasm states a cause as fact[12]. Newsweek called the midterms "disastrous" for the GOP, which is the outlet's own judgment. Its URL says Trump "refuses to take blame," and the congratulations get pushed down.
Foreign outlets focused elsewhere. Al Jazeera ran an explainer on Democratic powers: confirmation votes, subpoenas and challenges to tariffs. It also stressed the limits a veto sets[8]. The Times of Israel led with Trump saying the Iran war and gas prices hurt Republicans[4]. India's Open magazine framed the veto remark as a "clash" with Democrats[18].
What comes next is unsettled. Seat totals were still partial on Nov. 4[7]. Both sides hold a way to block the other. The likeliest result is many investigations and few new laws, unless the two sides strike deals[8].
Summary
Democrats won control of both the House and the Senate in the Nov. 3, 2026 midterm elections. The Associated Press called the House for Democrats at about 1:30 a.m. on Nov. 4. Democrats reached at least 54 Senate seats, having flipped at least seven[7][8]. Late Tuesday, President Donald Trump told CBS News: "My message is congratulations to the Democrats, and I look forward to working with you for the good of our country"[1]. In the same call he added: "Otherwise I'd just veto everything, and they're not gonna want that"[1][2].
Trump attributed the losses mainly to candidates rather than to himself. He said that "in some cases they didn't like the candidates, and in some cases those candidates were not my friend"[1][2]. On Truth Social he wrote: "I wasn't on the Ballot and if I was, we would have won IN A LANDSLIDE!"[3]. He also said the Iran war and gas prices played a part. "I think a part of it was Iran," he said, "but at the same time, people understood the importance of what I've done with Iran"[4][5]. Forbes reported that he said he accepts the results[6].
The main dispute is over what the vote was about. Trump and the White House call it a verdict on weak candidates. They say Trump did a better job promoting many of them than they did themselves[9]. Democrats and many commentators call it a verdict on Trump himself. They point to the Iran war, $4-a-gallon gas and tariffs[10][11][12]. Inside the GOP, House Republicans began blaming one another, and some blamed Trump[13][14].
What happens next rests on two powers. Democrats can now hold hearings, issue subpoenas and vote on Trump's nominees[8][14]. Trump can veto their bills. Overriding a veto takes two-thirds of both chambers. Democrats are well short of that on their own[8][15].
The Event
On election night, Nov. 3, 2026, and into the early hours of Nov. 4, AP race calls gave Democrats control of the House and the Senate[7]. In a phone call with CBS News, President Trump congratulated Democrats. He said he looked forward to working with them and noted he could "veto everything"[1]. In a phone interview with Fox News, he said Democrats "did a good job" and that voters "didn't like the candidates"[5][16]. He also posted on Truth Social that he would have won "IN A LANDSLIDE" had he been on the ballot[3].
Undisputed Facts
- The AP called the House for Democrats at about 1:30 a.m. ET on Nov. 4. By then Democrats had flipped at least 27 House seats, a partial count while results were still coming in[7].
- Democrats held at least 54 of the 100 Senate seats after flipping at least seven. Al Jazeera reported they were leading in two more races[7][8].
- Trump told CBS News: "congratulations to the Democrats, and I look forward to working with you for the good of our country"[1].
- In the same call Trump said: "Otherwise I'd just veto everything, and they're not gonna want that"[1][2]. In his Fox News interview he said: "I have the ultimate power — it's called 'veto'"[16].
- Trump wrote on Truth Social: "I wasn't on the Ballot and if I was, we would have won IN A LANDSLIDE!"[3].
- Trump said "a part of it was Iran." Asked about the war showing up in exit polls, he said: "I think it's the gasoline price"[4][5].
- A White House official said "candidate quality matters." The official said Trump "did a better job promoting many of the candidates on the ballot than the candidates did themselves"[9].
- Under Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution, a vetoed bill becomes law only if two-thirds of both the House and the Senate vote to override. In practice that means two-thirds of members present and voting[15].
The Pressure
Strip away the moralizing and blame. What structural realities persist regardless of which narrative wins?
- The veto math
- A veto can be overridden only by two-thirds of both chambers[15]. With about 54 Senate seats, Democrats would need at least 13 Republican senators to reach 67, if all 100 senators vote. So Trump's veto threat is credible. But a veto only blocks bills. It does not give Trump the power to pass anything. Each side holds a way to stop the other[8][15].
- Oversight does not need the president
- Committee subpoenas, hearings and Senate confirmation votes require no presidential signature. That is why Democrats talk about investigations, and why the veto cannot reach them[8][14][16].
- Blame shapes 2028
- Whoever wins the argument over why Republicans lost, Trump or his candidates, gains leverage over the party's next primaries and its leadership races. Those leadership votes come next week[13][20].
Material realityStarting in January, Democrats will control the House and the Senate. Trump keeps the veto and the executive branch[7][8]. Gas prices and the Iran war were major issues for voters, and Trump himself said both played a role[4][5]. Seat totals were still partial on Nov. 4[7]. Whatever explanation wins out, the coming years likely mean many investigations and few new laws unless the two sides make deals[8].
Narrative as a weaponTrump and the White House are working to pin the loss on individual candidates. That would protect his standing with the party's base before 2028[1][9]. Democrats and left-leaning outlets want the result read as a national vote against Trump, which would justify aggressive oversight[12][14]. Republican factions are using the loss to settle internal scores ahead of leadership elections[13]. Foreign outlets mostly read the result through the Iran war and its price at the pump[4][8]. Trump's conciliatory words and his veto line came in the same call. Readers should weigh both, not whichever half an outlet chose to headline[1].
How Each Side Sees It
Each major actor’s view — how it frames things, its underlying incentive, and how it’s materially affected. Tap a side to read it.
Frames it asMidterms are local contests, and voters judged the candidates in front of them. Trump said some of those candidates "were not my friend"[1] and suggested his base turned out less because he was not on the ballot[1]. In his view, a lost House race does not repeal his own 2024 mandate. In the Fox interview he said Democrats "did a good job"[11]. His offer to work with Democrats, backed by a veto, is presented as normal divided government: deal with me, or nothing passes[1].
WhyTo keep control of the Republican Party heading into 2028. To avoid being cast as a lame duck. And to set the terms for talks with Democrats before their majorities are sworn in[13][18].
Impact on themFor the first time in either of his terms, Trump faces a Congress with both chambers run by Democrats. They control House committee subpoenas and Senate confirmation of his nominees[8]. Bills he wants now need Democratic votes[8].
Frames it asDemocrats say the vote judged Trump's record, not his candidates. They point to the Iran war, gas near $4 a gallon, and tariffs[10][11]. HuffPost noted that Trump himself had asked voters to treat the midterms as a vote on him, and they did[12]. Democrats see oversight as Congress's constitutional job toward a White House some of them call lawless. Their tools are hearings, subpoenas and confirmation votes[14][8].
WhyTo use their new majorities to investigate the administration. To block or reshape Trump's nominees and policies. And to build a record they can run on in 2028[14][6].
Impact on themDemocrats gain control of the agenda and of investigations in both chambers. But they cannot pass laws over a veto without many Republican votes. So some fights may end in gridlock instead of new laws[8][15].
Frames it asParty leaders say one bad night does not undo what they passed in the last two years. Speaker Mike Johnson said he was "disappointed" but "never discouraged"[19]. Below the leaders, the party is split over the cause. Some blame candidate choices and campaign strategy. Others, including some departing lawmakers, blame Trump or his team[13][20].
WhyMembers who return need Trump's base for their primaries. They also need swing voters for the general election. Leaders face internal elections next week that Axios reported they might not survive[13].
Impact on themRepublicans lose control of both chambers. Their leaders face challenges. And they must choose between defending Trump's vetoes and voting with Democrats on popular bills[13][8].
Frames it asOverseas coverage mostly frames the vote as a judgment on the Iran war and its effect on fuel prices. It focuses on the practical result: a president who can still veto, facing a Congress that can investigate and slow him down[8][4][18].
WhyAllies and rivals want to know whether U.S. policy on Iran, tariffs and trade will change, or whether Washington is headed for a standoff[8][18].
Impact on themA Democratic Senate could reject nominees and challenge tariffs. That could affect trade partners and U.S. policy in the Gulf. But any reversal still runs into Trump's veto[8].
Like this article?
The Bias Ledger average rating 4.3
The same story, as framed by outlets across the spectrum, ordered least to most biased. The bias score (1 = straight, 10 = heavily spun) is an AI assessment of that framing — click an outlet to see its track record. The tell is the word choice or omission that reveals the angle.
| Outlet | Vantage | Bias | How they frame it | The tell |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBS News | U.S. center | 2 | Trump congratulates Democrats in election night call with CBS News | Mostly straight. It leads with the network's own scoop and the friendly line, and gives the "veto everything" quote as the follow-up, not the headline. |
| Al Jazeera | Qatari state-funded | 3 | Democrats win Congress: How they did it, and what it means | An explainer on institutional powers: subpoenas, confirmations and the veto. It pays less attention to Trump's blame comments. It frames Iran-war costs as a central driver of the vote. |
| Fox News | U.S. right | 4 | Trump congratulates Democrats after Republicans lose the midterms / Democrats sweep House and Senate, Republicans blame Trump for loss | The news side is fairly direct about the GOP loss. The companion story highlights Democratic victory posts such as "Subpoenas" and "lawyer up," which can be read as casting Democratic oversight as payback. Trump himself attacked Fox's coverage that night[21]. |
| Times of Israel | Israeli, center | 4 | Trump, conceding stunning midterm loss, admits Iran war and gas prices hurt Republicans | It puts the Iran angle first. "Admits" plays up a partial concession, and "stunning" adds drama the story does not attribute to anyone. |
| Newsweek | U.S. center-left | 5 | Donald Trump Reacts to Disastrous Midterms For GOP, Blames Candidates | "Disastrous" is the outlet's own judgment, and the URL slug says Trump "refuses to take blame." The congratulations and the offer to work together are pushed down. |
| Open | Indian, center-right magazine | 5 | US Midterms 2026: Trump's 'VETO' Warning Sparks Clash with Democratic-Controlled Senate | "Warning" and "clash" turn a conditional remark into a confrontation. The congratulations are left out of the headline. |
| HuffPost | U.S. left | 7 | Trump Wanted Americans To Vote Like He Was On The Ballot And They Eagerly Obliged | "Eagerly obliged" is sarcasm that states a cause as fact: the loss was about Trump. It gives Trump's candidate-quality explanation no real hearing. |
References
- Trump congratulates Democrats in election night call with CBS News — CBS News · U.S. mainstream broadcaster (Paramount-owned), center
- Donald Trump congratulates Democrats after midterm election wins — The Hill · U.S. center, Nexstar-owned political trade outlet
- Donald Trump Says GOP Would Have Won 'In a Landslide' if He Was on the Ballot — Yahoo News · U.S. aggregator/publisher, center
- Trump, conceding stunning midterm loss, admits Iran war and gas prices hurt Republicans — Times of Israel · Israeli independent online outlet, center
- Trump congratulates Democrats on midterms, says Iran war played role — Yahoo News · U.S. aggregator/publisher, center
- Trump Congratulates Democrats, Says He Accepts Election Results — Forbes · U.S. business media, center-right
- Midterms 2026 election results and live updates: Democrats win Senate and House, taking control of Congress from Republicans — Yahoo News · U.S. aggregator/publisher, center; relays AP race calls
- Democrats win Congress: How they did it, and what it means — Al Jazeera · Qatari state-funded broadcaster
- White House blames bad GOP candidates as poor results come in for Republicans — The Hill · U.S. center, Nexstar-owned political trade outlet
- Democrats pounce on $4 a gallon gas, blame Trump's Iran war for 'broken promise' — Fox News · U.S. right, Fox Corp.-owned
- Trump says Democrats 'did a good job,' blames Republican candidates for midterm losses — PBS NewsHour · U.S. public broadcaster, center to center-left
- Trump Wanted Americans To Vote Like He Was On The Ballot And They Eagerly Obliged — HuffPost · U.S. left, BuzzFeed-owned
- House Republicans torch each other over "brutal" midterms losses — Axios · U.S. center, Cox Enterprises-owned
- Democrats sweep House and Senate, Republicans blame Trump for loss — Fox News · U.S. right, Fox Corp.-owned
- Veto Override Procedure in the House and Senate — Congressional Research Service (congress.gov) · U.S. government, nonpartisan legislative research agency of Congress
- Trump congratulates Democrats after Republicans lose the midterms — Fox News · U.S. right, Fox Corp.-owned
- Trump congratulates Democrats after dominant midterms, says he looks forward to working with them — Yahoo News · U.S. aggregator/publisher, center
- US Midterms 2026: Trump's 'VETO' Warning Sparks Clash with Democratic-Controlled Senate — Open · Indian newsmagazine (RPSG Group), center-right
- House speaker 'disappointed,' but 'never discouraged' on GOP losing majority — The Washington Times · U.S. right, owned by Unification Church-linked Operations Holdings
- Republicans' midterm blame game starts early — Axios · U.S. center, Cox Enterprises-owned
- President Trump bashes Fox News with multiple rants on latest midterm polling updates — NewsNation · U.S. center, Nexstar-owned cable channel