Democrats Set 100-Day Agenda on Costs, Health Care and the Iran War; Trump Says He Will Veto Bills He Calls 'Insane'
Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer will lead majorities in both chambers starting in January, but they fall short of the votes needed to override a veto or, in the Senate, to break a filibuster.
Two Majorities, One Veto
Democrats won both the House and the Senate on November 3. The Associated Press said their House majority is "well past" the 218 seats needed. It also said they hold at least 54 of 100 Senate seats[1]. NBC News estimates the House number at no fewer than 255 of 435 seats. Some races were still uncalled as of November 5[12].
The next day, President Trump held a press conference. He said Democrats "'ll send over things that are insane, and I'll veto them"[4]. He predicted that after "a couple of months of vetoes," Democrats would ask how to get things done, and "we'll work together"[4].
So here is the tension. Democrats have won more power than they've had in years. They still can't turn most of their agenda into law without the man who just promised to veto it.
A Plan Built on Costs
House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer laid out priorities on November 4 and 5. The new Congress convenes in January[1][2]. Jeffries grouped the plan under "affordability, accountability" and what he called American values[11].
The first-100-days list is long. It includes lowering the cost of gas and groceries, reversing Medicaid cuts, and restoring SNAP food aid. It also includes extending the ACA tax credits, ending Trump's tariffs, and stopping the war with Iran[1][2][11]. House Democrats first laid out much of this plan on October 14, before the election[13].
The plan also has an "accountability" half. Democrats intend broad investigations of Trump, his family and his administration[1]. Jeffries says impeachment is neither on nor off the table[3].
What the Veto Math Allows
Overriding a veto takes two-thirds of each chamber. That means 290 of 435 House members and 67 of 100 senators. Democrats' estimated 255 House seats and at least 54 Senate seats fall well short of both[1][12].
The Senate adds a second wall. Most bills need 60 votes to end debate under the filibuster rule. With 54 seats, Democrats need at least six Republicans on most bills. Democrats see that as a minority blocking a mandate. Republicans see it as a check that forces broad agreement[18].
There is one workaround. Budget bills passed through "reconciliation," the process Republicans used for H.R. 1, need only a simple majority. They still need the president's signature[15][18].
What Democrats can do without Trump is investigate. Committee chairs can hold hearings and issue subpoenas. A simple House majority can impeach, but removal takes 67 Senate votes[1][3].
Health Care: Law Already Written
The Republican changes are already law or already in effect. H.R. 1, the 2025 budget law, cuts an estimated $911 billion from federal Medicaid spending over ten years[14][15]. Its work requirements must be in place in states by January 1, 2027. That's the same month the new Congress is seated[15].
Republicans defend those requirements. Expansion adults must work, volunteer, study or join a job program for at least 80 hours a month[17]. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Congress's nonpartisan scorekeeper, credits the rule with $326 billion in federal savings over ten years. It also projects 5.3 million more people uninsured[15]. Republicans say the rule moves able-bodied adults toward work.
Critics, including the health-policy nonprofit KFF, read the same numbers differently. They argue most of the savings come from eligible people losing coverage over paperwork, not from people getting jobs[17][14]. The CBO record is solid on the dollars. It doesn't settle which reading is right.
The ACA fight has its own history. The enhanced premium credits lowered what people pay for marketplace plans. Republicans note they were temporary and written to expire after 2025. They did lapse. CBO projects people receiving the credits will fall from 20.9 million in 2025 to 9.7 million in 2028, a 54% drop[16]. That means more than half of those who got help in 2025 are projected to lose it. CBO also projects the uninsured will rise by 7.5 million in 2027 and 8.7 million in 2028, compared with 2025[16].
Democrats cite those numbers as proof voters asked for a change. Undoing any of it needs a new law. That means Trump's signature or a two-thirds override[1].
The War Congress Didn't Vote On
U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran began on February 28, 2026. Congress hadn't declared war or authorized them[21]. The administration says it needs no authorization. It points to a ceasefire and an end of hostilities since April[21].
Democrats make a constitutional argument. Congress, not the president, decides when the nation goes to war. Schumer says Congress's "power of the purse" is "one of the ways of deterring a president who does war without the consent of the American people"[7]. The purse works like this. Spending bills keep the military and government funded. Democrats can write limits into them, such as limits on Iran operations.
Trump can veto those bills. But then the government risks a shutdown. Each side bets the public will blame the other[7][19]. Trump also keeps command of the military either way[2].
The election has a war angle too. Vice President JD Vance said the Iran war was the reason Republicans lost[6]. Trump said it played a part but that he "did the right thing"[4][6]. He has also pointed to gasoline prices and to not being on the ballot himself[6].
The Fight Inside Each Party
The loudest argument may be inside the Democratic Party. Centrists and leadership want a disciplined cost-of-living majority. Jeffries has said getting even with Trump isn't a priority, and he presents oversight as work to "hold the crooks accountable"[1][10]. Leaders have an incentive to protect swing-district members. They also want to avoid an impeachment fight that could swamp the cost message[3][9].
Progressives see it the other way. A big majority is wasted if leaders play it safe. To them, "not getting even" sounds like a promise not to use power voters handed over[10][9]. With a larger caucus, they have more votes and more friction with leadership[9].
Republicans are regrouping. Speaker Mike Johnson won't run for minority leader[18]. They keep the veto and the filibuster as their main defenses. Trump wants to protect his tariffs, the Iran campaign and the 2025 budget law[4][8].
Coverage split along these lines. The AP called it a "resounding sweep" and a "new era"[1]. Fox News led with impeachment, and its URL called it a "tractor beam" that could derail the affordability message[3]. Just the News stressed the veto pen and an agenda "pulling in opposite directions"[8]. The New Republic covered Jeffries from his left[10]. Axios called it an "epic power struggle"[9].
Al Jazeera and TRT World put Iran first. Both asked whether Democrats can deliver[19][7]. Iran International noted Democrats' demand to end the war[20].
Right-leaning outlets and progressives both play up the impeachment fight, for opposite reasons. Progressives want leaders pushed toward it. Right-leaning outlets want the majority to look divided.
What's unresolved is the first test. Funding bills are coming. Will Trump veto a spending bill that limits Iran operations, and will Democrats let the government run short of money to hold the line?
Summary
Democrats won control of both the House and the Senate in the November 3 midterms. Their House majority is 'well past' the 218 seats needed, and they hold at least 54 of 100 Senate seats[1]. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer have laid out a first-100-days agenda. It aims to lower the cost of gas and groceries, reverse cuts to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act (ACA), restore SNAP food aid, end Trump's tariffs, and stop the war with Iran[1][2]. Democrats also plan broad investigations of Trump, his family and his administration. Jeffries says impeachment is neither on nor off the table[1][3].
President Trump struck a mixed tone. He said he could work with Democrats. He also said: 'They'll send over things that are insane, and I'll veto them'[4][5]. He predicted that after 'a couple of months of vetoes,' Democrats would come to him to make deals[4]. Trump said the Iran war played a part in his party's losses but that he 'did the right thing'[4][6].
The main dispute is about what the election gives Democrats the power to do. Democrats and their allies call it a mandate to undo Republican health cuts and end a war Congress never approved[2][7]. Republicans and Trump say Democrats still cannot pass laws without him, and the administration says it needs no congressional authorization for its Iran operations[1][8][21]. A veto override takes two-thirds of each chamber, and Democrats are well short of that[1][8]. Inside the Democratic Party, a separate fight is over how hard to go after Trump, with oversight and impeachment at the center of it[9][10].
The Event
On November 4 and 5, 2026, after winning majorities in both chambers, Democratic leaders Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer outlined their priorities for the new Congress, which convenes in January[1][2]. Jeffries grouped the plan under 'affordability, accountability' and what he called American values[11]. Schumer said Democrats could use Congress's control over spending to push for an end to U.S. military operations against Iran[7]. At a November 4 press conference, Trump said he would veto bills he considered 'insane'[4].
Undisputed Facts
- Democrats won majorities in both the House and the Senate on November 3, 2026, flipping both chambers from Republican control[1].
- NBC News's Decision Desk estimates Democrats will hold at least 255 of the 435 House seats. AP reported Democrats hold at least 54 of 100 Senate seats; some races were still uncalled as of November 5[1][12].
- Jeffries' stated 100-day priorities include reversing Medicaid cuts, restoring SNAP funding, extending ACA tax credits, ending Trump's tariffs and stopping the war in Iran. House Democrats first laid out much of this plan on October 14, before the election[11][13].
- U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran began on February 28, 2026, without a declaration of war or congressional authorization. The administration says it does not need authorization, citing the ceasefire and an end to hostilities since April[6][21].
- Vice President JD Vance said the Iran war was the main reason for Republican losses. Trump said it played a part but defended the decision[6][4].
- Trump said he would veto legislation he considers 'insane.' Democrats do not hold the two-thirds majorities in either chamber needed to override a veto[4][1].
- The 2025 Republican budget law, H.R. 1, cuts an estimated $911 billion from federal Medicaid spending over ten years. Its new work requirements must be in place in states by January 1, 2027[14][15].
The Pressure
Strip away the moralizing and blame. What structural realities persist regardless of which narrative wins?
- The veto math
- A bill becomes law only if the president signs it, or if two-thirds of both chambers vote to override his veto. That means 290 of 435 House members and 67 of 100 senators. Democrats' estimated 255 House seats and at least 54 Senate seats are well short of both thresholds. Any Democratic bill Trump opposes therefore needs Republican votes to survive[1][12]. That is why reversing tariffs or Trump's foreign policy is hard even with majorities[1].
- The Senate filibuster
- Under Senate rules, most bills need 60 votes to end debate and get to a final vote. With at least 54 seats, Democrats need at least six Republicans on most bills. Democrats see this as a minority blocking a mandate. Republicans see it as a check that forces broad agreement. Budget bills passed through 'reconciliation,' the process Republicans used for H.R. 1, can pass with a simple majority. They still need the president's signature[15][18].
- The power of the purse
- Congress must pass spending bills to keep the government and the military funded. That gives a majority leverage the veto cannot fully cancel. If a funding bill does not pass, money runs out. Democrats can write limits into those bills, for example on spending for Iran operations. Trump can veto them, but then the government risks a shutdown. Each side bets the public will blame the other. That is the lever Schumer named[7][19].
- Health-care deadlines
- Medicaid work requirements must be in place by January 1, 2027, the same month the new Congress is seated[15]. CBO estimates the rule saves $326 billion over ten years and leaves 5.3 million more people uninsured[15]. The two sides read those numbers differently. Republicans say the rule pushes able-bodied adults toward work. Critics, including KFF, argue that most of the savings come from eligible people losing coverage over paperwork, not from people getting jobs[17][14].
Material realityThe Republican changes are already law or already in effect. H.R. 1's Medicaid cuts are scheduled, and the enhanced ACA premium credits lapsed after 2025. CBO projects that people receiving ACA premium credits will drop from 20.9 million in 2025 to 9.7 million in 2028, a 54% fall[16]. In plain terms, more than half of those who got help paying their premiums in 2025 are projected to lose it by 2028. Undoing any of this requires a new law, which means Trump's signature or a veto override[1]. On Iran, Democrats call for ending U.S. military operations, while the administration says hostilities ended with an April ceasefire and that it needs no congressional authorization[21]. Congress's most direct tool is funding, and Trump keeps command of the military[7][2]. What Democrats can do without Trump is investigate. Committee chairs can hold hearings and issue subpoenas. A simple House majority can impeach, but removal requires 67 Senate votes[1][3].
Narrative as a weaponThree groups are working hardest to shape how the result is read. Democratic leaders want voters to see a disciplined, cost-of-living majority. They want to avoid looking like a party bent on revenge, which is why Jeffries keeps impeachment 'neither on nor off the table'[1][3]. Trump wants the veto seen as the start of a negotiation and Democrats seen as the 'insane' party. He also wants the Iran war seen as a principled decision with a political cost[4]. Progressives and right-leaning outlets agree on one thing for opposite reasons: both play up the impeachment fight. Progressives want leaders pushed toward it. Right-leaning outlets want the majority to look divided and overreaching[9][10][3]. Foreign outlets, meanwhile, frame the whole election around the war[19][7].
How Each Side Sees It
Each major actor’s view — how it frames things, its underlying incentive, and how it’s materially affected. Tap a side to read it.
Frames it asTheir strongest case is that voters asked for exactly this agenda. Cost of living drove the vote, and the party ran on lowering it[2][3]. On health care, they cite budget scorekeepers' own numbers. CBO projects the uninsured will rise by 7.5 million in 2027 and 8.7 million in 2028, compared with 2025[16]. On Iran, they make a constitutional argument. Congress, not the president, decides when the nation goes to war. Schumer calls the 'power of the purse' 'one of the ways of deterring a president who does war without the consent of the American people'[7]. Jeffries presents oversight as anti-corruption work to 'hold the crooks accountable,' not revenge. He has said getting even is not a priority[1][10].
WhyLeaders want to show results by 2028 and keep swing-district members safe. They also want to avoid a fight over impeachment that could swamp the cost-of-living message[3][9].
Impact on themControl of committees gives Democrats subpoena power and control of the House calendar. They also get leverage over must-pass spending bills. But they still need Trump's signature, or a two-thirds override, to change law[1][8].
Frames it asProgressives argue that a large majority is wasted if leaders play it safe. They see Trump's conduct and an unauthorized war as reasons to use every tool, including impeachment, not just a list of bills[10][9]. To them, voters punished Trump, and holding him accountable is what voters asked for. 'Not getting even' sounds to them like a promise not to use power the voters handed over[10].
WhyThey want the agenda and committee priorities to reflect the party's left and its grassroots activists[9].
Impact on themWith a much larger caucus, they have more votes inside it. They also have more friction with leadership over oversight and impeachment[9][10].
Frames it asTheir strongest case is that the Constitution still gives the president a full role in lawmaking. The veto is a check written into the system, not obstruction. Trump frames vetoes as a road to compromise: after 'a couple of months of vetoes,' Democrats will 'say, How do we get this stuff done? And we'll work together'[4]. On Medicaid, Republicans defend H.R. 1's work requirements. The rule asks expansion adults to work, volunteer, study or join a job program for at least 80 hours a month[17]. CBO credits the rule with $326 billion in federal savings over ten years[15]. On the ACA, Republicans note the enhanced premium credits were temporary expansions written to expire after 2025. On Iran, Trump says he 'did the right thing' and has said he would do it again. The administration argues it needs no congressional authorization, and Trump has also attributed the losses partly to gasoline prices and to his not being on the ballot[4][6][21].
WhyTrump wants to protect his signature policies (tariffs, the Iran campaign, the 2025 budget law) and to cast Democrats as overreaching before 2028[4][8]. Republicans also need to regroup. Speaker Mike Johnson will not run for minority leader[18].
Impact on themRepublicans lose control of the agenda and face House investigations. They keep the veto, and in the Senate the filibuster rule, as their main defenses[1][8].
Frames it asFor audiences abroad, the main question is whether Congress can end the Iran war. Turkish and Qatari outlets highlight Schumer's 'this war must end' and the spending lever[7][19]. Iranian opposition outlets note that Democrats are demanding an end to the war[20].
WhyGulf and regional states want the conflict, and its disruption of shipping and oil, to end. They watch Washington for signs the war will be scaled back[19][20].
Impact on themTheir security and energy markets depend on whether Congress uses funding limits and whether Trump bows to that pressure[7][19].
Like this article?
The Bias Ledger average rating 4.1
The same story, as framed by outlets across the spectrum, ordered least to most biased. The bias score (1 = straight, 10 = heavily spun) is an AI assessment of that framing — click an outlet to see its track record. The tell is the word choice or omission that reveals the angle.
| Outlet | Vantage | Bias | How they frame it | The tell |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Associated Press | U.S. center | 3 | Democrats usher in a new era with their resounding sweep of the House and the Senate | 'Resounding sweep' and 'new era' are strong, celebratory phrasing for a wire story. The body does include the veto limits. |
| Fox News | U.S. right | 4 | Jeffries says House Democrats have not ruled out Trump impeachment | The headline accurately reflects Jeffries' statement, but it leads with impeachment, which is not among his stated 100-day priorities, rather than the cost and health items. The URL slug calls impeachment a 'tractor beam' that could 'derail' the affordability message. |
| Axios | U.S. center | 4 | House Democrats face epic power struggle over their massive majority | 'Epic power struggle' makes an internal-caucus story sound dramatic. The focus is on palace intrigue rather than policy. |
| Al Jazeera | Qatari state-funded | 4 | Can Democrats stop Iran war, reverse Trump's tariffs after midterms win? | The Iran war comes first, and the outlet repeatedly says Trump began it 'without congressional authorisation.' Domestic health-care items get less weight. |
| TRT World | Turkish state | 4 | Democrats may use funding control to push end to Iran war: Schumer | It narrows the whole agenda to the war-funding lever, the angle that matters most to its regional audience. |
| Just the News | U.S. right | 5 | New Democratic majority faces Trump's veto pen, and an agenda pulling in opposite directions | It frames the win mainly through its limits and internal splits. Democrats' policy goals come second. |
| The New Republic | U.S. left | 5 | Hakeem Jeffries Says Impeachment and Getting Even Aren't Priorities | It covers Jeffries from his left. His caution becomes the story, and the piece invites progressive objections. |
References
- Democrats usher in a new era with their resounding sweep of the House and the Senate — Associated Press · U.S. wire service, nonprofit cooperative; center
- Democratic sweep of Congress ushers in a new era as Trump acknowledges impact of the Iran war — Associated Press · U.S. wire service; center
- Jeffries says House Democrats have not ruled out Trump impeachment — Fox News · U.S. right; owned by Fox Corp. (Murdoch family)
- Trump admits Iran war hurt Republican vote, vows to veto 'insane' bills — Al Jazeera · Funded by the government of Qatar
- Trump: Iran War 'Part' of Republican Midterm Defeat — Haaretz · Israeli, center-left, privately owned
- No regrets: Trump says Iran war justified despite polls drubbing — Al Jazeera · Funded by the government of Qatar
- Democrats may use funding control to push end to Iran war: Schumer — TRT World · Turkish state broadcaster
- New Democratic majority faces Trump's veto pen, and an agenda pulling in opposite directions — Just the News · U.S. right; founded by John Solomon
- House Democrats face epic power struggle over their massive majority — Axios · U.S. center; owned by Cox Enterprises
- Hakeem Jeffries Says Impeachment and Getting Even Aren't Priorities — The New Republic · U.S. left/progressive opinion magazine
- Jeffries Launches Bid for Speaker, Lays Out 100-Day Agenda for New Majority — The Epoch Times · U.S. right; affiliated with the Falun Gong movement
- Midterms 2026 highlights: Democrats win control of Congress — NBC News · U.S. center-left; owned by Comcast
- House Democrats Plan a First 100-Days Agenda if They Sweep to Power in Midterm Elections — Associated Press · U.S. wire service; center
- How Will the One Big Beautiful Bill Act Affect the ACA, Medicaid, and the Uninsured Rate? — KFF · Health-policy research nonprofit; generally favors expanded coverage
- Congressional Budget Office Supplemental Cost Estimate, October 28, 2025 (P.L. 119-21, Medicaid) — Congressional Budget Office · Congress's official budget scorekeeper; nonpartisan by statute, criticized by both parties
- CBO Reaffirms Forecast of a Dramatic Reduction in Health Coverage in 2026 and Beyond — The Century Foundation · U.S. progressive think tank (summarizing CBO data)
- A Closer Look at the Work Requirement Provisions in the 2025 Federal Budget Reconciliation Law — KFF · Health-policy research nonprofit; generally favors expanded coverage
- Democrats flip House in blow to Donald Trump agenda — The Hill · U.S. center; owned by Nexstar Media
- Democrats won Congress. But can they deliver on their promises? — Al Jazeera · Funded by the government of Qatar
- Democrats demand end to Iran war after US midterm sweep — Iran International · London-based Persian-language broadcaster opposed to Iran's government; reported Saudi-linked funding
- Iran strikes were launched without approval from Congress, deeply dividing lawmakers — NPR · U.S. public media; center-left